Overview of the Collection
Historical NoteJames Edward Murray was born in St. Thomas, Ontario, on May 3, 1876, the son of Irish immigrants. He was named after a wealthy uncle from Butte, Montana, who later financed his education at New York University Law School. He became an American citizen in New York. Upon his uncle's urging, Murray moved to Butte after graduation in 1901 to establish his legal practice. It was in Butte that Murray met and married Viola Edna Horgan, with whom he had six sons. Murray became active in Democratic Party politics in Butte, and earned the party votes by working for a time alongside the miners in the copper industry. After inheriting a sizable portion of his uncle's fortune, Murray spent most of the 1920s pursuing business interests. His considerable loss in the stock market crash of 1929 left Murray with an embittered view of eastern financiers, an attitude he would carry through his years in politics. In 1931, Murray, the Democratic Party Chairman of Silver Bow County, became an early convert to the presidential camp of Franklin D. Roosevelt. As a result of his work on the candidate's behalf, he earned an appointment as a member of Montana's Public Works Administration Advisory Board. It was through that appointment that Murray gained first hand knowledge of Montana's drought-stricken farmers, who he would take an active interest in throughout his political career. In 1934, Murray, with the support of a number of prominent Butte politicians, decided to seek election to the final two years remaining in the Senate term of the late Thomas J. Walsh. Murray won the election with labor support in Butte, and, riding on the political coat tails of Roosevelt and senior Montana Senator Burton K. Wheeler, Murray, at 59, began his senate career. He was an avid supporter of Roosevelt's domestic program, a loyal party man, and an isolationist in the area of foreign affairs. Wheeler and Murray started out as political allies, but the relationship soon turned sour. One deciding factor that split their union was their differences over the president's Supreme Court packing plan. Wheeler was against it. The other main factor causing the split was Murray's transition from an anti-British isolationist to an outspoken proponent of Roosevelt's foreign policy leading to World War II. At that time, Wheeler was still an avid proponent of isolationism. The feud came to a peak during Murray's 1942 re-election bid, when Wheeler openly tried to undercut Murray's bid in the Democratic primary. The two senators attacked each other on statewide radio. Murray won the election by an extremely narrow margin, and returned to Washington, D.C. During the war Murray became an avid supporter of small business, and Murray's resolution created the Senate's Special Committee on Small Business, with him as the committee's first chairman. He used his influence in the committee to introduce bills designed to assist America's small businesses, securing for them highly sought after military contracts. At the close of the war, Murray's prime concern was the loss of those wartime contracts, and he drafted reconversion legislation to ease the burden on the small businesses. These legislative bills and Murray enjoyed the support of the Senate Republicans, because of America's free enterprise system. During the Truman and Eisenhower administrations, Murray did not fare so well with the Republicans or the conservative Southern Democrats; the conservative coalition managed to thwart or alter virtually all of Murray's legislation. An example of this was the Murray sponsored bill, the Employment Act of 1946. The bill was to establish a formal system of compensatory government spending to ease the burden of the cyclical dips in the private economy, but the law that emerged from the Senate virtually eliminated that principle. Another obstacle to Murray's political goals during the 1940s was the medical lobby who were fighting Murray's legislation to provide a nationwide system of health insurance. Physicians and drug companies, led by the American Medical Association, managed to block all of the various Murray measures that they collectively labeled "socialized medicine." Despite these opponents, other Murray sponsored bills eventually became law, such as the "Wagner-Murray-Dingell" bills which extended Social Security coverage, allowed for federal dollars for hospital construction, and provided Medicare for senior citizens. Presidential opposition also hampered Murray's aspirations. Harry Truman and the Montana senator parted company when Truman would not support Murray's plan for the Missouri River basin. Murray wanted to throw his support behind a plan to unify Missouri basin development under jurisdiction of a single regional authority after a series of catastrophic floods. Truman allied himself with the downstream advocates of navigation and flood control, and Murray's plan lost out to Truman and the southern senators who chaired key committees and thwarted his MVA legislation. Murray, in turn, tried to use his influence as the chairman of the Senate Labor Committee to block a number of bills designed to alter the pro-union bend of Wagner's National Labor Relations Act. In the end, he could not prevent the Republican 80th Congress from passing the Taft-Hartley Act. Murray's unfaltering devotion to the labor workers did not go unnoticed in Montana. Murray, with the support of the miners from Butte, timber workers, the railroad brotherhoods, and scores of lesser unions, was able to defeat powerful Republican opponents in a series of narrow election victories. In the most bitter of those elections, Murray faced a powerful opponent in the state's eastern district congressman, Wesley A. D'Ewart, in 1954. Murray's advanced age became an issue. D'Ewart also accused Murray of being used as a tool of the international Communist conspiracy. The basis for these attacks came with Murray's strong advocacy of a close American-Soviet friendship during the war, along with the senator's votes against many of the post-war Communist-curbing bills. Murray still won the election. The senator used his influence as the Senate's Interior Committee Chairman to secure western water projects that led to congressional approval and funding for large dams in Montana at Canyon Ferry on the Missouri River, Yellowtail on the Bighorn, Hungry Horse on the Flathead, and Libby on the Kootenai. With these dams, Murray was an early convert to the causes of energy conservation and environmental protection. Even in an era in which these issues were not yet popular, Murray supported numerous bills that called for environmental protection, a national system of wilderness areas, development of wind energy, and curbing air pollution. Murray gained national attention when he sponsored bills providing for the admission of Alaska and Hawaii to the union. He also gained attention when he, along with Montana Congressman Lee Metcalf, pushed for an ambitious program designed to provide massive federal aid for public schools. The Murray-Metcalf Bill was direct precursor of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act that became law several years following Murray's death. In 1960, Murray's declining health forced him into retirement. He died four months after leaving the Senate on March 23, 1961. Content DescriptionThe collection contains the senatorial papers of James E. Murray from 1934 until his retirement from office in 1960. The bulk of the collection consists of general correspondence while in office. The series represents state, as well as national, correspondence. The other series in the collection are legislative, speeches and writings, clippings, film, and photographs. The legislative series consists mostly of Senate bills and resolutions sponsored by Murray. The body of the speeches and writings series consists of press releases, radio and public addresses. Murray utilized the radio to speak to his constituents in Montana while working in Washington, D.C. The clippings series documents topics of interest to Murray in newspaper and journal publications. Use of the Collection
Restrictions on Access :
Researchers must use collection in accordance with the policies of the K. Ross Toole Archives, the Maureen and Mike Mansfield Library, and The University of Montana-Missoula. Restrictions on Use :Researchers are responsible for using in accordance with 17 U.S.C. and any other applicable statutes. Copyright not transferred to The University of Montana. Preferred Citation :[Name of document or photograph number], James E. Murray Papers, K. Ross Toole Archives, Maureen and Mike Mansfield Library, The University of Montana-Missoula. Administrative Information
Arrangement :
The collection is divided into six series: Series I: General Correspondence, 412.5 linear feet, 1934-1960 Series II: Legislation, 51.5 linear feet, 1934-1960 Series III: Speeches and Writings, 13.5 linear feet, 1934-1960 Series IV: Clippings, 5.5 linear feet, 1936-1961 Series V: Film, 16 reels, 1953-1960 Series VI: Photographs, 0.5 linear feet, 1933-1960
Custodial History :
The James E. Murray family donated this collection to the University of Montana History Department in 1960. The date of transfer to the archives is unknown, but likely occurred around 1969. The processed collection was formally opened in 1989. Don Spritzer held several boxes of materials for use in his dissertation until 2000. Brian Cockhill returned materials that apparently were removed from the collection for photocopying during the 1970s. Acquisition Information :Gifts of the James E. Murray family, 1960, Vic Reinemer, 1973 and 1978, and Don Spritzer, 2000. Processing Note :The actions of the original processor are unknown. In 1998 archives staff updated the original finding aid to provide more details on folder content. Film materials were also re-associated with the collection. In 2003, several segments of materials received after transfer from the History Department were processed and integrated into the existing collection order. These materials included one folder of materials received from Brian Cockhill; two boxes of Rural Electrification Authority materials received from Don Spritzer; and seventeen files of photographs received from Vic Reinemer. In addition to the photographs from Vic Renemer, all photographs originally received during transfer from the History Department were removed from the archives general photograph collection and reintegrated into the Murray collection. Separated Materials :In 1998 six reels of 16-mm film were transferred to the Montana Historical Society's Lee Metcalf collection, since they primarily concerned the former Representative. Detailed Description of the Collection412.5 linear feet
This series consists of correspondence to Senator Murray from constituents all over the United States, and especially from Montana, as well as intergovernmental correspondence related to the constituents' issues. Murray was interested in numerous issues during his tenure in the Senate, including agriculture, foreign affairs, immigration, Indian affairs, labor, legislation, military, mining, and the Missouri Valley Authority. Public works, small business, veterans, World War II, and the Works Progress Administration were his other areas of concern. Many of the constituent's letters to Senator Murray are requests: Many ask for support or defeat of a certain bill, or pose questions on a topic. Murray's replies document what his political, as well as private, views were. Since Murray's political career began in Montana, he was very interested in the plights of Montana farmers and ranchers. Constituents concerned with agriculture represent a large portion of the series. Murray acted as a mediator in much of the correspondence between the constituent and other parties, including a federal agency, such as the U.S. Department of Agriculture, or another Montanan. Murray secured loans for many people through his correspondence, or just eased individuals' worries. Another area with which Murray dealt with great passion was the success of small business, both before, during, and after World War II. Through his correspondence, Murray answered many questions and concerns that people had about small business throughout the nation. This portion of Murray's constituents was national, not just Montana based. Murray was very interested in the plight of the Native Americans during his career in the Senate. This was another area in which Murray's constituents were not just Montana based, but national. He was concerned with the Navajo Indians as well as the Alaska tribes, but Montana's Native American remained his main priority. He dealt with both sides of the issues facing the Native Americans: Some of the correspondence deals with concerns from white constituents over land rights, while much deals with fair treatment for the Indians. Murray again acted as a mediator many times between a party in Montana and the U.S. Department of the Interior. Murray was also interested in federal Indian welfare. He was not in support of termination of Indian tribal rights during the 1940's and 1950's. Murray went national in his concerns with labor. Murray was a member of the Senate Labor Committee, and eventually became the chair late in his career. Murray drafted the Fair Labor Standards Act, which generated much correspondence from his national constituents. He also drafted the precursor to the Full Employment Act, the Employment Act of 1946. That generated much national opinion. Murray concerned himself with national labor issues and took an active role in the mediation of strikes across America. He was very involved in the railroad strikes as well as the copper and motion picture strikes. The Missouri Valley Authority is another major focus. The MVA was to provide support to the people of the Missouri River. In that area of correspondence, Murray collected maps, statements from other Congressmen, Senate Reports, and hearings reports. Murray received national coverage for his work in this area, which was also documented. However, this section of the papers contain less correspondence between Murray and constituents. In this series, most of the constituent's letters and a copy of Murray's response are represented. Murray sometimes responded with a form letter, but in many cases the constituent got a unique letter addressing their concerns and problems. There are not many personal letters in this series, as much of the correspondence deals with the pressing issues of the time. Much of the correspondence in this series dealt with the support or denial of a certain bill or piece of legislation. The series is arranged alphabetically by topic.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||